At an installation of SharePointPortal Server 2003 were created automatically
3 databases.
The jobs for optimizations and integrity check for one of these databases
produce always errors:
[Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)] Error 1934: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL
Server Driver] [SQL Server]DBCC failed because the following SET options have
incorrect settings: 'QUOTED_IDENTIFIER'
I changed repeatedly QUOTED_IDENTIFIER, but the errors appeared again.
I used directly the DBCC statements for all tables of the database and I
became no errors.
What can I do?
Thank you in advance for your help
Andreas Marner
Sounds like you have a computed column or an Indexed view in the database.
There is a bug with the MP that does not allow it to handle these very well.
I recommend you create your own scheduled job to issue the backups and
reindexing for at least those db's.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Marner" <marner@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6F859E50-AE75-4587-95F8-F4697BF4FD6F@.microsoft.com...
> At an installation of SharePointPortal Server 2003 were created
automatically
> 3 databases.
> The jobs for optimizations and integrity check for one of these databases
> produce always errors:
> [Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)] Error 1934: [Microsoft][ODBC
SQL
> Server Driver] [SQL Server]DBCC failed because the following SET options
have
> incorrect settings: 'QUOTED_IDENTIFIER'
> I changed repeatedly QUOTED_IDENTIFIER, but the errors appeared again.
> I used directly the DBCC statements for all tables of the database and I
> became no errors.
> What can I do?
> Thank you in advance for your help
> Andreas Marner
Showing posts with label installation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label installation. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Optimization and integrity check errors
At an installation of SharePointPortal Server 2003 were created automatically
3 databases.
The jobs for optimizations and integrity check for one of these databases
produce always errors:
[Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)] Error 1934: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL
Server Driver] [SQL Server]DBCC failed because the following SET options have
incorrect settings: 'QUOTED_IDENTIFIER'
I changed repeatedly QUOTED_IDENTIFIER, but the errors appeared again.
I used directly the DBCC statements for all tables of the database and I
became no errors.
What can I do?
Thank you in advance for your help
Andreas MarnerSounds like you have a computed column or an Indexed view in the database.
There is a bug with the MP that does not allow it to handle these very well.
I recommend you create your own scheduled job to issue the backups and
reindexing for at least those db's.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Marner" <marner@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6F859E50-AE75-4587-95F8-F4697BF4FD6F@.microsoft.com...
> At an installation of SharePointPortal Server 2003 were created
automatically
> 3 databases.
> The jobs for optimizations and integrity check for one of these databases
> produce always errors:
> [Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)] Error 1934: [Microsoft][ODBC
SQL
> Server Driver] [SQL Server]DBCC failed because the following SET options
have
> incorrect settings: 'QUOTED_IDENTIFIER'
> I changed repeatedly QUOTED_IDENTIFIER, but the errors appeared again.
> I used directly the DBCC statements for all tables of the database and I
> became no errors.
> What can I do?
> Thank you in advance for your help
> Andreas Marner
3 databases.
The jobs for optimizations and integrity check for one of these databases
produce always errors:
[Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)] Error 1934: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL
Server Driver] [SQL Server]DBCC failed because the following SET options have
incorrect settings: 'QUOTED_IDENTIFIER'
I changed repeatedly QUOTED_IDENTIFIER, but the errors appeared again.
I used directly the DBCC statements for all tables of the database and I
became no errors.
What can I do?
Thank you in advance for your help
Andreas MarnerSounds like you have a computed column or an Indexed view in the database.
There is a bug with the MP that does not allow it to handle these very well.
I recommend you create your own scheduled job to issue the backups and
reindexing for at least those db's.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Marner" <marner@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6F859E50-AE75-4587-95F8-F4697BF4FD6F@.microsoft.com...
> At an installation of SharePointPortal Server 2003 were created
automatically
> 3 databases.
> The jobs for optimizations and integrity check for one of these databases
> produce always errors:
> [Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)] Error 1934: [Microsoft][ODBC
SQL
> Server Driver] [SQL Server]DBCC failed because the following SET options
have
> incorrect settings: 'QUOTED_IDENTIFIER'
> I changed repeatedly QUOTED_IDENTIFIER, but the errors appeared again.
> I used directly the DBCC statements for all tables of the database and I
> became no errors.
> What can I do?
> Thank you in advance for your help
> Andreas Marner
Labels:
automatically,
created,
database,
databases,
errors,
installation,
integrity,
jobs,
microsoft,
mysql,
optimization,
optimizations,
oracle,
server,
sharepointportal,
sql
Monday, March 12, 2012
Optimal installation on Win 2003
Hi
I'm fairly new to this, so bare with me...
I have to make a new installation of an MS SQL 2000 EE on a Windows 2003 Std. Edt.
HW:
-------
Dual Xeon 2,4 + 1 GB Ecc
1 x 32 MB Adaptec 2100S RAID Controller
2 x 18 GB 10K HD
4 x 18 GB 15K HD
-------
So far I have made following configuration...
-------
2 x 18 GB 10K HD / RAID 1
- C:\OS
- D:\MSSQL program files + System DB's (Master, pubs ect.)
4 x 18 GB 15K HD / RAID 5
- E:\TempDB
- F:\Data + Logs
-------
But I'm not sure that this is the optimal configuration, and I'm willing to start all over :)
So my q's are......
-------
Which RAID configuration would you suggest?
Which partitions on the raids would you suggest?
Which usage would you assign the various partitions?
How do I move the system and temp db's?
-------
Thanx!
Regards,
Taras Bredel dkHi Taras,
I just had our systems guys create a SQL 2000 box on Win 2k3. I have a raid 5 (with 2 HD) on a dual p3 with 1 gig of ram.
Let me just say that I can't remember having so many problems with a SQL box. Granted anyone using Win 2k3 in a production environment should have expected some early adopter problems, I didn't think my problem would be so frustrating.
My problem is that I can't get the SQL box to listen on any ports. By default, SQL server should listen on port 1433. I can plainly see that Network Utility has TCP/IP enabled and the default port is 1433.
I'm this close to rebuilding that box to a win 2k server.
The only thing really stopping me now is debating what is less work - moving the data - or trying to fix the SQL server.|||Hi Lee
Well it could install it on a W2K, but benchmarks shows that the performance gain on W2K3 should be considerably large.
So my advice to you is trouble shoot the W2K3 installation.
//Taras|||Taras,
Yes. That was the main reason that I wanted it on a 2k3 machine. The data is to be served internally on a quasi realtime basis. This is not a real-time system - but I would like as much performance as possible.
Once you get the machine up and running tell me if you had any problems.
Thanks.
I'm fairly new to this, so bare with me...
I have to make a new installation of an MS SQL 2000 EE on a Windows 2003 Std. Edt.
HW:
-------
Dual Xeon 2,4 + 1 GB Ecc
1 x 32 MB Adaptec 2100S RAID Controller
2 x 18 GB 10K HD
4 x 18 GB 15K HD
-------
So far I have made following configuration...
-------
2 x 18 GB 10K HD / RAID 1
- C:\OS
- D:\MSSQL program files + System DB's (Master, pubs ect.)
4 x 18 GB 15K HD / RAID 5
- E:\TempDB
- F:\Data + Logs
-------
But I'm not sure that this is the optimal configuration, and I'm willing to start all over :)
So my q's are......
-------
Which RAID configuration would you suggest?
Which partitions on the raids would you suggest?
Which usage would you assign the various partitions?
How do I move the system and temp db's?
-------
Thanx!
Regards,
Taras Bredel dkHi Taras,
I just had our systems guys create a SQL 2000 box on Win 2k3. I have a raid 5 (with 2 HD) on a dual p3 with 1 gig of ram.
Let me just say that I can't remember having so many problems with a SQL box. Granted anyone using Win 2k3 in a production environment should have expected some early adopter problems, I didn't think my problem would be so frustrating.
My problem is that I can't get the SQL box to listen on any ports. By default, SQL server should listen on port 1433. I can plainly see that Network Utility has TCP/IP enabled and the default port is 1433.
I'm this close to rebuilding that box to a win 2k server.
The only thing really stopping me now is debating what is less work - moving the data - or trying to fix the SQL server.|||Hi Lee
Well it could install it on a W2K, but benchmarks shows that the performance gain on W2K3 should be considerably large.
So my advice to you is trouble shoot the W2K3 installation.
//Taras|||Taras,
Yes. That was the main reason that I wanted it on a 2k3 machine. The data is to be served internally on a quasi realtime basis. This is not a real-time system - but I would like as much performance as possible.
Once you get the machine up and running tell me if you had any problems.
Thanks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)