Opportunity to provide feedback on performance improvements in SQL Server...

Please consider giving your feedback or suggestions on the top 5 OLTP and
data warehouse performance improvments you would like to see in the next
version of SQL Server. Please use the links below to provide your comments.
http://blogs.msdn.com/sqltips/archiv..._NEXT_SQL.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/sqltips/archiv..._NEXT_SQL.aspx
Thanks
Umachandar Jayachandran
Microsoft SQL Server Performance Team
SQL Server Engine Team Tips Blog at
http://blogs.msdn.com/sqltips/default.aspx
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Dude, Microsoft doesn't listen to customers... don't kid yourself
Umachandar Jayachandran [MS] wrote:
> Please consider giving your feedback or suggestions on the top 5 OLTP and
> data warehouse performance improvments you would like to see in the next
> version of SQL Server. Please use the links below to provide your comments.
> http://blogs.msdn.com/sqltips/archiv..._NEXT_SQL.aspx
> http://blogs.msdn.com/sqltips/archiv..._NEXT_SQL.aspx
> Thanks
> Umachandar Jayachandran
> Microsoft SQL Server Performance Team
> SQL Server Engine Team Tips Blog at
> http://blogs.msdn.com/sqltips/default.aspx
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|||Hello susiedba@.hotmail.com,
s> Dude, Microsoft doesn't listen to customers... don't kid yourself
Ha! I had a nickle for everytime they listened to me and the customers I
worked with, I wouldn't need to work. You've either got an axe to grind or
don't have a clue.
Thanks,
Kent Tegels
http://staff.develop.com/ktegels/
|||On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:03:09 +0000 (UTC), Kent Tegels
<ktegels@.develop.com> wrote:
in <b87ad74a0568c8bc58f4dcddd0@.news.microsoft.com>

>Hello susiedba@.hotmail.com,
>s> Dude, Microsoft doesn't listen to customers... don't kid yourself
>Ha! I had a nickle for everytime they listened to me and the customers I
>worked with, I wouldn't need to work. You've either got an axe to grind or
>don't have a clue.
>Thanks,
>Kent Tegels
>http://staff.develop.com/ktegels/
>
And you clearly don't have any code assets in VB6 :: no forward
migration path other than a complete rewrite. And SQL Server 2000 won't
be supported on Vista. It seems yours is a rather myopic view.
Stefan Berglund
|||Hello Stefan,
SB> And you clearly don't have any code assets in VB6 :: no forward
SB> migration path other than a complete rewrite.
Yep, I woke and smelled the coffee early. All 40+ of my VB4/VB5/VB6 applications
are now running faster and more reliably in .NET, most of them since late
2003. I'm sorry if *you* are stuck in the stone ages, but frankly, *you*
made that decision.
SB> And SQL Server 2000
SB> won't be supported on Vista. It seems yours is a rather myopic
SB> view.
Yawn. I hear very few of my customers or users even talking about adopting
Vista anytime soon -- there's nothing in it that's an immediate driver for
them. I am hearing chatter about IIS7, so *maybe* Longhorn looks to be painful
for them. Of course, they still have the option of running on Server 2003
R2 until they are migrated to SQL 2005.
So I'm not so sure that I'm the only one that's suffering from myopia, Stefan.

Thanks,
Kent Tegels
http://staff.develop.com/ktegels/