hi,
I use sqlw2k sp3 server. I have configure 2xRAID1 with 4 ucp and 8GB
RAM. The first RAID1 for operation system and binary sql and the secend
RAID1 for data. I want to use one instance for two independent database.
Both database will have about 10-20GB data.
I am not sure where put the transation log (on which RAID the first or
the secend). This is my one question.
And my secend question concerning filegroup. Do you have any recommend
to the optimal of this?
rgs,
sylwester
--
Posted via http://dbforums.comIf you only have two RAID1 arrays you might be better off placing the =OS, binaries, data files on one array and the log files on the other =array.
a better setup would involve three raid sets
RAID set: OS + binaries + tempdb + system databases
RAID set: data files
RAID set: log files
The level of RAID that you choose should depend on your desired level of =performance and redundancy.
-- Keith
"skosci" <skoscielecky@.hotmail.com> wrote in message =news:3334411.1062764290@.dbforums.com...
> > hi,
> > > > I use sqlw2k sp3 server. I have configure 2xRAID1 with 4 ucp and 8GB
> RAM. The first RAID1 for operation system and binary sql and the =secend
> RAID1 for data. I want to use one instance for two independent =database.
> Both database will have about 10-20GB data.
> > > > I am not sure where put the transation log (on which RAID the first or
> the secend). This is my one question.
> > > > > > And my secend question concerning filegroup. Do you have any recommend
> to the optimal of this?
> > > > rgs,
> > sylwester
> > > --
> Posted via http://dbforums.com|||Hi Keith,
So I supposed like you. I cannot change configure on the level
RAID just now.
On the one RAID1 installed OS with 33GB.
The secend RAID1 has got 66GB.
Real size of both database is 12GB. In your first recommend I should
reinstall OS.
Tell me more what do you think if I setup like below:
first RAID set: OS+binaries+tempdb+systemdatabase and
secend RAID set: data files and log files.
How much it's worse from your first recommend?
Regards,
Sylwester
Posted via http://dbforums.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment